Health-care ruling doesn’t fix the system | Editorial

The U.S. Supreme Court’s upholding of most of President Obama’s health-care law doesn’t end the discussion of health care in this country. Fixing the system has a long way to go.

  • Wednesday, July 18, 2012 12:24pm
  • Opinion

The U.S. Supreme Court’s upholding of most of President Obama’s health-care law doesn’t end the discussion of health care in this country. Fixing the system has a long way to go.

The court’s 5-4 decision was somewhat of a surprise. Conservatives had argued that Congress could not use the concept of interstate commerce to force everyone to buy health insurance. The court’s majority decision essentially agreed with that.

However, Chief Justice John Roberts and the four liberals on the court said the government’s move amounted to a tax — and that is something well within the power of Congress. People still won’t have to buy health insurance, but they will face a tax liability if they don’t.

As much as the health-care debate has centered on legal arguments, the fact remains that our health system is flawed. The new law will fix some of that, but we still have a long, long way to go.

Most Americans have health coverage provided by large employers. They won’t see major changes. The real impact is for the poor.

There are 32 million people in this country who are shut out from having health care. Either they are too poor to afford it or they are so sick that a private insurance company won’t provide them coverage.

The law will change much of that, by expanding Medicaid — the federal/state program that helps the poor — and by making Health Benefit Exchanges available where people can compare costs and benefits of health insurance programs.

However, these improvements come at a cost — or at least a concern. Making sure all people have health insurance means more people will be seeing physicians. Today, there are not enough doctors to treat all these new, potential patients.

The health-care debate will continue — it is, after all, a presidential election year. But if it’s done nothing else, the Supreme Court’s decision has forced politicians and the public to face this issue. That, at least, is a start.

— Reporter Newspapers

More in Opinion

Dozen advisory measures on the ballot will tax voters’ attention

Voters will get a chance this fall to offer their opinions on every one.

State’s new voting system passes key test

Whew. The primary (on Aug. 6) marked the electoral debut of VoteWa,… Continue reading

Correcting our ways | Letter

Correcting our ways I am angered, moved and remain hopeful by the… Continue reading

Publisher’s decision to limit eBook access is bad news for library patrons

What’s at stake is the issue of digital equity and access.

Trump’s message unseemly but not racist | Letter

Many of Ms. Pak’s columns revolve around a recurring theme: “Let’s talk… Continue reading

A heavy burden | Letter

There are more than 110,000 residents of our state living with Alzheimer’s… Continue reading

Vote ‘yes’ on Prop. 1 | Letters

Vote ‘yes’ to Prop. 1 Please vote to approve the revised Prop.… Continue reading

We’re better than this | Windows and Mirrors

The effects Trump’s words can have on us.

Reporter publishes new letters policy

Letters policy is meant to provide direction and transparency.

A climate crisis | Letter

A climate crisis Aaron Kunkler’s article on feedback loops of CO2 and… Continue reading

KCLS forges partnerships for broader public benefit

Partnerships make it possible for KCLS to serve a broader range of people, while stretching tax dollars.

The importance of being counted | Windows and Mirrors

The 2020 Census is coming and that can greatly affect everything from government representation and federal funding.