Health-care ruling doesn’t fix the system | Editorial

The U.S. Supreme Court’s upholding of most of President Obama’s health-care law doesn’t end the discussion of health care in this country. Fixing the system has a long way to go.

  • Wednesday, July 18, 2012 12:24pm
  • Opinion

The U.S. Supreme Court’s upholding of most of President Obama’s health-care law doesn’t end the discussion of health care in this country. Fixing the system has a long way to go.

The court’s 5-4 decision was somewhat of a surprise. Conservatives had argued that Congress could not use the concept of interstate commerce to force everyone to buy health insurance. The court’s majority decision essentially agreed with that.

However, Chief Justice John Roberts and the four liberals on the court said the government’s move amounted to a tax — and that is something well within the power of Congress. People still won’t have to buy health insurance, but they will face a tax liability if they don’t.

As much as the health-care debate has centered on legal arguments, the fact remains that our health system is flawed. The new law will fix some of that, but we still have a long, long way to go.

Most Americans have health coverage provided by large employers. They won’t see major changes. The real impact is for the poor.

There are 32 million people in this country who are shut out from having health care. Either they are too poor to afford it or they are so sick that a private insurance company won’t provide them coverage.

The law will change much of that, by expanding Medicaid — the federal/state program that helps the poor — and by making Health Benefit Exchanges available where people can compare costs and benefits of health insurance programs.

However, these improvements come at a cost — or at least a concern. Making sure all people have health insurance means more people will be seeing physicians. Today, there are not enough doctors to treat all these new, potential patients.

The health-care debate will continue — it is, after all, a presidential election year. But if it’s done nothing else, the Supreme Court’s decision has forced politicians and the public to face this issue. That, at least, is a start.

— Reporter Newspapers

More in Opinion

Taking time to say thank you to our supporters

As the holidays approach, I would like to take this opportunity to… Continue reading

When asked their opinion on contract talks, they were silent

A 2017 law lets lawmakers offer negotiation topics. But a bipartisan panel didn’t do so this week.

Changing systems doesn’t happen overnight | Windows and Mirrors

It’s been a year since the Menchie’s incident and here is what the city of Kirkland has been working on since then.

From a place of respect | Windows and Mirrors

What does it mean to share your culture with others?

The power of reliable power

Don C. Brunell is a regional columnist.

More community members weigh in on election | Letters

Thompson has positive ideas I write in support of Mason Thompson for… Continue reading

An unenforceable ban | Letter

As the advisory vote in Snohomish County regarding a fireworks ban approaches,… Continue reading

Mental health: One size does not fit all | Windows and Mirrors

The challenges of providing mental health services for communities of color.

Community members weigh in on election | Letters

Sperry cares for Kenmore My husband and I are supporting Van Sperry… Continue reading

Does Sound Transit realize the consequences of this do-over?

Pass or fail, Initiative 976 is a reminder of what critics most dislike about the regional agency.

Thompson is ‘exceptionally well qualified’ | Letter

I am currently the presiding judge for Snohomish County District Court and… Continue reading