City-council health-insurance issue revisited

A city council can not increase their compensation without having to stand for re-election. However, a 2007 change in state law permits them to immediately bestow generous health-insurance benefits on themselves. At its first meeting last January, the Bothell City Council did just that (see Jan. 16 Reporter article). The insurance covers not only the councilmember but also their spouse and all dependents at no cost! How many of us are so fortunate today?

In order to take effect, at least four of the seven had to sign up. At that time, four councilmembers already had medical insurance either through their employment or their spouse. One of those, Sandy Quinn, chose to drop her employer coverage and joined Bill Evans, Joshua Freed and Mark Lamb in taking advantage of the benefit they had just voted themselves. (Quinn stated at the Nov. 25th council meeting that she previously had to pay to cover her husband.)

During the recent budget hearing for the city’s 2009-10 budget, several citizens testified that such a benefit was overly generous and insensitive to the impact the hard economic times are having many of our citizens. It will cost the taxpayers $16,000 (’09) and $17,370 (’10) for each councilmember. It was suggested that the $133,550 in the budget should instead be donated to Hopelink to help meet the needs of those who are really struggling. The council brushed that aside. (A Dec. 3 article in the Reporter dramatized just how bleak Hopelink’s situation is.)

But something else came out during the hearing. There is a gross disparity in the compensation being received by the individual councilmembers. For the two-year budget period, councilmembers Freed, Lamb, Quinn and Evans are receiving more than $45,000 in pay and benefits while councilmen Spivey and Ewing are only receiving the $12,000 stipend — just over 25 percent of the other four.

The case of councilwoman Samborg is even more unfair. She opposed granting the benefit in January and has refused to participate. Her husband’s insurance requires her to pay $150/month to maintain her coverage since she has other insurance available. Over the two-year period, that effectively reduces her compensation to $8,400! That’s just 19 percent of what the other four are receiving. You have to admire her commitment to her principles.

On Dec. 2, a majority of the council approved the budget and continued their overly generous benefits. The voters next November will have their chance to pass judgment on their action.

Bill Moritz


More in Letters to the Editor

Mental health and young people | Letter

Whenever someone asks how my day is, my muscle memory immediately responds… Continue reading

Downtown parking issues in Bothell | Letter

We were unable to attend the (city of Bothell’s) Planning Commission meeting… Continue reading

How to define a family | Letter

Could you imagine happy, loving, warm families all around? Without judgment or… Continue reading

When illness becomes wellness | Letter

“A child’s mental health is just as important as their physical health… Continue reading

Take care of yourself | Letter

Novelist Eleanor Brown writes, “Self-care is not selfish. You cannot serve from… Continue reading

Hemp vs. plastic | Letter

Every piece of plastic ever made in the world still exists. Today… Continue reading

‘Massage parlor’ is an antiquated term | Letter

In the Sept. 14 issue of the Bothell/Kenmore Reporter, Aaron Kunkler referred… Continue reading

Something is wrong in America | Letter

Something is wrong when the president is elected by a minority but… Continue reading

Vote NO on I-1639 | Letter

We have heard repeatedly from the Attorney General Bob Ferguson on his… Continue reading

The complexities of the abortion debate | Letter to the editor

A Bothell resident believes the abortion debate can be resolved by meeting in the middle.

Vote them out | Letter to the editor

A letter about state lawmakers and gun violence.